"You have a choice. You can live in a country ruled by a monarch. Like Britain. You can choose to live in a Republic. Like the USA. Or you can choose a dictatorship. Then again, maybe you can’t choose that. In fact, you don’t have a whole lot of choice about ANYTHING in a dictatorship.
If you select the first option, you will be ruled over by someone who inherits the job by accident of birth, and not by any merit of his/her own, and is hugely wealthy and privileged. You are a ‘subject’ of that country. You can’t evict them, (except by revolution), but you do get stability and continuity, and modern monarchs have tended to be politically impartial.
On the other hand, in a Republic, you get to elect your leaders every four or five years, and you are ‘citizens’. Because they are voted in, you can boot them out when they do a lousy job, but they are for ever vying for votes and tend to be populist, short-termers and often contentious. Election bandwagons are also expensive to bankroll.
I know most about the monarchy option, having been a ‘subject’ for some 65 years now. It costs all British tax-payers a whole lot of money to maintain, by means of something called ‘The Civil List’, and we don’t just have to finance the Queen, but an ever-increasing royal family. BUT, we do get a lot back in terms of prestige, tourism opportunities and international diplomacy. And nobody does pomp and ceremony like the Brits.Their powers are limited these days. No-one has their heads chopped off any more. And certain things are definitely expected of them.For instance, this week, when the new Prince was born to the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge, better known as William and Kate.
When my own three daughters were born, I gave their naming a lot of thought. I wanted names which both I and my husband liked, which would grow up with them, wouldn’t cause them embarrassment, and be as appropriate at aged two as at eighty. They must be unusual but not way-out, and they must have a meaning with some significance. So the eldest was named Frances Helen, meaning ‘free’, (a good thing for a child of God), and ‘bright’.The middle girl, Hilary Anne, meaning ‘cheerful’ and ‘God is gracious’. And the youngest, Alison Ruth, whose name translates as ‘noble’ and ‘friend’. These were all my self-imposed limitations.
But I sensed a real struggle for the young royal pair, when choosing a name for their firstborn son…..and future king. Because some names with a royal pedigree would be acceptable, but many would not. Tradition is EVERYTHING when it comes to the monarchy. So many of us suspected that George would be high on the list of possibles.
It would be unimaginable for the future king to be christened Dwayne or Tyrone or Shane. And it would be frowned on to call a princess Candice, Courtney or Nicolette.Names have to be noble, sensible, with gravitas. And history. Consequently, the pool of suitable names is really quite small: - Henry, William, Charles, John, Philip and of course George, and a few others. On top of that, some of those are already spoken for.
And oddly, the more I mused on it, the more sorry I felt for the royals! Because they don’t just have to please themselves, or their family members, but an entire nation; nay a world! For all their money and privilege, in some ways, they have less freedom than me.
There should be at least three names given to the new child. And each name would be analysed by the pundits, and referenced by them, so that George would hark back to the much-loved father of the Queen, who reluctantly found himself the unlikely monarch following his brother’s abdication.
Alexander may have been a more-or-less free choice and sop to Kate, who maybe felt that her arm had been twisted. Then again, one of the Queen’s names is in fact Alexandra, so it may instead be a tribute to the great-gran. And Louis is undoubtedly after Lord Louis Mountbatten, uncle of Prince Philip and second cousin to the Queen, who was murdered by the IRA.
When he’s old enough to be aware of such things, I just hope he doesn’t grow up a crisis of confidence and think that his parents may have preferred a daughter, or have doubts over his own masculinity, when he realises what his initials spell out!"